Legal Opinion

In Re the Guardianship of Carlsmith

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2007No. 27569PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold, in this appeal by Respondents-Appellants Edith M. Carlsmith (Edith) and Carl Duane Carlsmith (Duane) [collectively Respondents], from the September 26, 2005 order granting in part and denying in part the motion of Petitioner-Appellee Cynthia Carlsmith-Crespi (Cynthia) for attorney’s fees and sanctions (order) of the family court of the first circuit (the court) 1 , and its September 26, 2005 judgment (judgment), which (a) sanctioned Edith to pay attorneys fees and expenses for failure to make discovery 2 pursuant to Hawai'i Family Court Rules (HFCR)…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Devose v. HerringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. Matter of Estate of LintWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Murphy v. LintWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Lanai Co., Inc. v. Land Use Com'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kamaka v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & StifelHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Williams v. AonaHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re the Guardianship of CarlsmithHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Lite v. McClureHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Blakeney v. KenworthyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API