Legal Opinion
Rice v. Crow
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 15, 2000No. B130074PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, J. *
Plaintiff Harvey Rice (Rice) appeals from a summary judgment granted against him and in favor of Robert Trammell Crow (Crow), Neal Pardee (Pardee), Robert Rickard (Rickard) and Ronald Cox (Cox) (collectively Defendants). Relying on the decision in Arciniega v. Bank of San Bernardino (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 213 [60 Cal.Rptr.2d 495] (Arciniega), Defendants argued, and the trial court agreed, that Rice’s settlement and dismissal with prejudice of a legal malpractice action against his former attorneys arising from their representation of him earlier in these proceedings…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. v. Crest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Honkanen v. Hopper (In Re Honkanen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Le Parc Community Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Alpha Mechanical, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.