Legal Opinion
City of Oakland v. Hassey
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 2008No. A116360PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEPULVEDA, J.
— Respondent City of Oakland (Oakland) sued appellant Kenny D. Hassey for breach of contract after Hassey failed to reimburse the city (as agreed) for the costs of training him to become a police officer with the Oakland Police Department. Hassey filed a cross-complaint against Oakland and respondent Richard Word, the Chief of the Oakland Police Department, alleging that the agreement to repay Oakland for training costs violated the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219; FLSA) and various state laws. The trial court granted Oakland’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gordon v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Bland v. Edward D. Jones & Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- Davis v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Hahn v. Diaz-BarbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.