Legal Opinion

Hahn v. Diaz-Barba

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 2011No. D056528PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred under the forum non conveniens doctrine by staying an action against residents of California for tortious interference with contract and other business torts for the sale of an interest in a Mexican business. Plaintiffs contend defendants did not meet their burden of proving Mexico is a suitable alternative forum, or that on balance the private and public interests favor Mexico as the more convenient forum. We affirm the order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Parties

Plaintiffs are Wolfgang Hahn and Nikita U,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Murphy v. Schneider National, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. FedalizoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. National Football League v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Garibotti v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Jenni Rivera Enters., LLC v. Latin World Entm't Holdings, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Altafulla v. ErvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API