Kuehne & Nagel, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Restani, Judge:
Plaintiff challenges Customs’ classification of certain entries made in 1984 of tobacco, in a form smaller than half leaves, as stemmed filler tobacco under item 170.35 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). Plaintiff claims the appropriate TSUS item is 170.60, scrap tobacco. Alternatively, plaintiff claims classification under item 170.80, tobacco, not specifically provided for.
As always, the starting point as the court’s analysis is the statute. At first glance, the merchandise would seem to be stemmed filler tobacco, and item 170.35 would seem to be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Haig v. AgeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rohm & Haas Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Hawaiian Motor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Maiden Lane Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972