Legal Opinion
Rohm & Haas Company v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 9, 1984No. Appeal 83-1177PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Court of International Trade, 568 F.Supp. 751 sustaining the classification of the imported merchandise by the District Director of Customs at the Port of New York. We affirm.
I
The issue in this case is the proper classification for Customs purposes of sheets of acrylic resin imported from Taiwan. The Customs Service classified the merchandise under item 771.41 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as “flexible” plastic sheets and admitted them duty-free under the General System of Preferences as products from Taiwan. See…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moscahlades Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Bentkamp v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Bar Zel Expediters, Inc., A/c Ben Clements & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- United States v. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, N.Y.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
3Cited by42 opinions
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Russell Stadelman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Texaco Marine Services, Inc. And Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.