Schweiger v. Loewi & Co., Incorporated
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The sole issue is whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The appellant states that this appeal is from that part of the order overruling the demurrer to the complaint and from the order overruling the demurrer to the amended complaint. It is not necessary, however, to consider the original complaint because it is supplanted by the amended complaint. See: Werner v. Riemer (1949), 255 Wis. 386, 388, 39 N. W. 2d 457, 39 N. W. 2d 917.
When a pleading is challenged by demurrer, it is to be liberally construed with a view to substantial justice to the parties…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Whipp v. IversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Kruse v. SchieveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- D'ANGELO v. Cornell Paperboard Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Werner v. RiemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Stevenson v. BarwineckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Market Street Associates Limited Partnership and William Orenstein v. Dale FreyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Badger Pharmacal, Inc., D/B/A Wisconsin Pharmacal Company, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Company and Softsoap Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. BoeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.