Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Boeck
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.
The issues decided in this case are: (1) Does a commodities broker who undertakes to provide investment information and counsel to a customer with a nondiscretionary account, and who later learns that previously given information has been changed or was incorrect, have a fiduciary duty to disclose the latest information before the customer invests through the same broker in reliance on the original disclosure?(2) Under what circumstances can a commodities broker be held strictly responsible for misrepresentation concerning investment advice?(3) Based on the jury instructions on fiduciary duty…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Leib v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
- Whipp v. IversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Robinson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Badger Pharmacal, Inc., D/B/A Wisconsin Pharmacal Company, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Company and Softsoap Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Foseid v. State Bank of Cross PlainsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.