Legal Opinion

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Boeck

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1985No. 83-675PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The issues decided in this case are: (1) Does a commodities broker who undertakes to provide investment information and counsel to a customer with a nondiscretionary account, and who later learns that previously given information has been changed or was incorrect, have a fiduciary duty to disclose the latest information before the customer invests through the same broker in reliance on the original disclosure?(2) Under what circumstances can a commodities broker be held strictly responsible for misrepresentation concerning investment advice?(3) Based on the jury instructions on fiduciary duty…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Leib v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
  4. Whipp v. IversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Robinson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Badger Pharmacal, Inc., D/B/A Wisconsin Pharmacal Company, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Company and Softsoap Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Foseid v. State Bank of Cross PlainsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API