Legal Opinion
In re Ford Motor Co. Vehicle Paint Litigation
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided August 25, 1998No. CIV.A. No. MDL 1063PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
VANCE, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification pursuant to Rule 23(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties extensively briefed this motion, *216and the Court heard oral argument in this matter on April 14, 1998. Following the argument, the Court requested that plaintiffs submit a trial plan and a proposed set of jury charges. Plaintiffs have done so, and defendant has responded to these pleadings. Based on the Court’s review of all of the foregoing materials and the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. StromboeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Ford Motor Co. v. SheldonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Debbs v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Chin v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.