Legal Opinion

Joyner v. Vitale

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1996No. S-6692, S-6712PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

J. Mitchell Joyner brought an action to remove the deed of trust from a property that he had purchased. The superior court determined that the encumbrance remained and that Joyner continued to owe its beneficiary, Vincent Vitale. Joyner appeals this decision. Vitale cross-appeals the court’s denial of his request for actual attorney’s fees. We affirm the superior court’s decisions granting partial summary judgment and judgment in favor of Vitale after trial. We reverse the trial court’s award of partial attorney’s fees and remand for an award of full…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State, Department of Natural Resources v. Transamerica Premier Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Johnson v. SchaubAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cleveland Trust Co. v. ElbrechtOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. T. Ferguson Construction, Inc. v. Sealaska Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stanley v. Carr-Gottstein PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API