Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Carr-Gottstein Properties

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 12, 2004No. 03-35200; D.C. No. CV-01-00308-A-JKSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Jose and Emelia Stanley appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Carr-Gottstein Properties (“the Developer”). They argue that the district court erred in finding that: (1) they were not entitled to enforce, as third party beneficiaries, a stipulation between the Developer and the Municipality of Anchorage (“the Municipality”) concerning the conveyance of an easement over the Developer’s property; and (2) the stipulation, if acted upon by the Municipality, would violate the Fifth Amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kodiak Electric Ass'n v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ellis v. City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kennedy Associates, Inc. v. FischerAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. OsborneAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Alaska Continental, Inc. v. TrickeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API