Legal Opinion

Adrien Fournier v. Canadian Pacific Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 27, 1975No. 319, Docket 73-1704PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, a section worker, sued the Canadian Pacific Railroad under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60, to recover damages for an injury to his left leg and foot which occurred while employed by the defendant. The railroad moved for summary judgment on the basis of a settlement agreement signed by Fournier which generally released the railroad from all liability arising from the accident. Finding no issue of fact to be tried that would permit the release to be set aside, Chief Judge Holden of the District of Vermont, after receiving affidavits from both sides,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Ramsouer v. Midland Valley R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Locafrance U. S. Corp. v. Intermodal Systems Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. De Pace v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Bristol Spring Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. Emerson v. SweetSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. McKenna v. Peekskill Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API