Brad Ragan, Inc. v. Callicutt Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing its complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6). We reverse.
Plaintiff sold tires to defendant Callicutt (Callicutt) on credit. Callicutt sold trucks on which the tires were mounted to defendant Lewis (defendant). Plaintiff contends that, in return for the sale of the trucks and tires, defendant Lewis orally promised Cal-licutt that he would pay plaintiff for the tires. Callicutt has filed for bankruptcy and plaintiff has taken no further action against it.
Defendant contends: that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- United Leasing Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- American Trust Co. v. Catawba Sales & Processing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Cassels v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Coleman v. ColemanNorth Carolina Business Court · 2015
- Raritan River Steel Co. v. CHERRY, BEKAERTCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986