Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
I
Plaintiffs appeal from the granting of defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaints for failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted. N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6). The issue is whether the complaints state claims based on third-party beneficiary contract doctrine and the tort doctrine of negligent misrepresentation. More particularly, we must decide whether a third person not in privity of contract with a certified public accountant has a claim against that accountant for negligent misrepresentation which allegedly results in loss to the third person.
We…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Davidson & Jones, Inc. v. County of New HanoverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Touche Ross & Co. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Hoots v. PryorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Driver v. Burlington Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Traxler v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.