Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Swenson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 10, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kalisch, J.

The legal question presented in this case is whether, where a bill of particular was furnished-by the plaintiff on demand made upon him by the defendant before answer filed, the latter may properly apply- to- the court after answer filed for a more specific bill of particulars.

The plaintiff’s action was commenced in this court on July 19th, 1923, to recover from the defendant the sum of $1,000 for legal services and expenses incurred in the performance of the same. Before answer filed the defendant demanded a bill of particulars. The…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hurd v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hopper v. GillettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  3. Billy v. TatarskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Morris Plan Co. of New York v. LorberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API