Legal Opinion

Morris Plan Co. of New York v. Lorber

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 21, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCase, J.

On November 25th, 1932, defendants were personally served with summons and complaint in an action on contract. The complaint was endorsed in accordance with the rule requiring the filing of an affidavit of merits. Four days thereafter defendants made demand upon plaintiff for a bill of particulars. On December 14th, 1932, no affidavit of merits having been filed, judgment for the plaintiff was entered by default against both defendants. Defendants now seek to have the judgment vacated as improvidently entered. No defense, meritorious or otherwise, is interposed. The defendants rely upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muir v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Dixon v. SwensonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  3. P. H. Laufman & Co. v. Hope Manfacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blum v. Jersey City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API