Legal Opinion

Billy v. Tatarsky

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 2, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, S. C. C.

This application is made by the plaintiffs to strike out a demand for a bill of particulars in a negligence action arising out of a collision between two automobiles. The demands might be grouped under several classes as follows : As to the manner in which the accident happened, as to the negligence charged, as to the injuries and their extent, as to the confinement and disability; as to the loss of wages, as to the physicians, and as to disbursements in, medical treatment.

The question in dispute raised on this motion have been the cause of a great many similar motions. There…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Watkins v. CopeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. Johnston v. BowersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  3. Greene v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Hopper v. GillettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  5. Paper C., MacHinery Co. v. NewlinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ditmars v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API