Legal Opinion
Porter v. Gestri
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 1926No. Docket No. 3072PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
On the seventh day of June, 1923, the parties entered into a written contract of sale by defendant to the plaintiffs of a certain lot of grapes. The parts of the contract material to the questions raised by the appeal are as follows:
“Whereas, the seller covenants and warrants that he is the owner of a certain lot of 2,400 twenty-five pound boxes of dried black grapes, principally Zinfandel and Mission variety; . . . the said seller . . . does hereby sell said dried black grapes, and all of them to the buyer, and the buyer . . . does hereby buy the same from the seller for the price of II14…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Firth v. RichterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Shearer v. Park Nursery Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Burge v. Albany Nurseries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Newhall Land & Farming Co. v. Hogue-Kellogg Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- El Zarape Tortilla Factory, Inc. v. Plant Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Lane v. C. A. Swanson & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Brandenstein v. JacklingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Thomas v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Pann v. Fay Fruit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930