Legal Opinion

Pann v. Fay Fruit Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1930No. Docket No. 6399PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1562.30, and representing the full purchase price of a carload of oranges purchased of defendant at Santa Ana, California. The material facts are as follows: On December 4, 1922, a representative of appellant called respondent on the telephone and asked him if he had any orders; quoted respondent two cars of navels, one for shipment that day and one on the following day. Respondent inquired concerning the quality and particularly concerning the color. The fruit was represented to be of “good color…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brandenstein v. JacklingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Porter v. GestriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. W. R. Grace & Co. v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ed S. Michelson, Inc. v. Nebraska Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API