Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an asbestosis case. It is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. We had reversed the trial court’s order denying appellant’s post-trial motions and had ordered a new trial on damages. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp., 322 Pa.Super. 348, 469 A.2d 655 (1983). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded with instructions that we consider an issue that we had found it unnecessary to decide: Whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it could reduce any award of damages for appellant’s disability by the percentage of his disability due to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Wade v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Embrey v. Borough of West MifflinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Smialek v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Bryant v. Girard BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- D'ANGELIS v. ZakutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Borman v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Dale v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.