Dale v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROWLEY, Judge:
This is an appeal from the Judgment entered on a jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff, Howard F. Dale, following the denial of post-trial motions and the assessment of delay damages pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 238. The plaintiff brought this action in trespass under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 (1972) (FELA), for injuries he sustained in the course of his employment with appellant, The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (B & 0). Plaintiff alleged that he was totally disabled as a result of developing asbestosis from continuous exposure to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Mohn v. Hahnemann Medical College & HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Matthews v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Castro v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gallo v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Meyer v. Union RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Dale v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- McDermott v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- McDermott v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.