Legal Opinion

Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 1987No. 33 W.D. Appeal Docket 1984; 52 W.D. Appeal Docket 1986PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

The issue before the Court in this products liability case is whether the trial court committed reversible error in instructing the jury that it could apportion damages between defendant-appellees and plaintiff-appellant.

Appellant, Joseph Edward Martin, filed a complaint in trespass on August 16, 1978, against appellees seeking compensatory and punitive damages for asbestosis and related diseases which he claimed were caused as a result of *380working with products containing asbestos manufactured by appellees.1

Appellant presented expert witnesses at trial who…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Lobozzo v. Adam Eidemiller, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. GAGLIANO v. DitzlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Allison v. Snelling & Snelling, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Voyles v. CorwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Summers v. CERTAINTEED CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Butterfield v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Alvin DILLINGER, Appellant, v. CATERPILLAR, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Wheeler MacHinery Company, Inc., a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Zarow-Smith v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  5. Loughman v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API