Legal Opinion
Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1277 v. SunLine Transit Agency
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 7, 1987No. CV 86-8270 RG(Gx)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GADBOIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1277 (“ATU” or “the Union”) requests this court to preliminarily enjoin defendant Sun Line Transit Agency (“STA” or “the Agency”) from instituting a random, mandatory alcohol and drug testing program. STA, a public corporation that provides mass transit in Palm Springs, California, employs forty bus drivers and ten maintenance workers (“public employees” or “employees”). The Union is the exclusive bargaining representative of the Agency’s employees.
On December 18, 1986, this court issued a temporary…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. BurnleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Bangert v. HodelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Railway Labor Executives' Association v. BurnleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- American Federation of Teachers v. Kanawha County Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.