Legal Opinion
Bangert v. Hodel
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 30, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-3549 (HHG), 88-3518 (HHG)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
These actions 1 challenge aspects of a drug testing program of the United States Department of the Interior. Plaintiffs in both lawsuits seek to enjoin random urinalysis testing, and plaintiffs in Bangert seek additionally to enjoin what is called reasonable suspicion testing. These programs are described in Part I, infra.
The legal principles which govern the validity of such programs are well known, having been laid out fully and fairly by my colleagues, Judges Flannery, 2 Revercomb, 3 and Hogan, 4 applying the analytical framework established in Jones…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Knox County Education Association v. Knox County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Burka v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- American Federation of Government Employees v. CavazosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Hartness v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. WatkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.