Legal Opinion

Smith v. Felkel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 3, 1923No. 11471PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILD, C.

The defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, filed suit in the district court of Texas county, Okla., on the 25th day of September, 1918, against the plaintiffs in error, hereinafter caled defendants, to recover a half interest ini and for partition of the following described lands: N. E. % of see. 33; S. Vs of S. ~W\ Vt; N. Vs of S. W. Vi and N. Ya of S. E. Vi of section 34, township 2 north, range 16 east O. M., being in Texas county, Okla., S. Vs of section 22, X. Vs of N. E. Vi and W. Vs of section 27, S. Vs of S. W. Vi of section 34, township 2 N., range…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Westlake v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Hoff v. HoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Border v. CarrabineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hickey v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Gilpatrick v. HatterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Smith v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Fulton v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Lavery v. GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API