Legal Opinion
Hickey v. Ross
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 12, 1946No. 31996PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HURST, V.C.J.
This is a suit to cancel a deed to 160 acres of oil and gas producing land in Caddo county and to recover an undivided four-sixths interest in the land. The plaintiffs, Mary E. Hickey,'Bertha A. Hays, and Josephine E. Flood, are the daughters of George Laflin and Nannie Laflin. The other plaintiffs are the children of Clarence Laflin, deceased son of Nannie Laflin and (presumably) George Laflin. George Laflin died in 1897, and thereafter Nannie Laflin married James Rig-ney. The defendants, Margaret Ross and Catherine Ross, are the children of James Rigney and Nannie Rigney, nee…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Flesner v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Bobier v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Hoff v. HoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Levy v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- McCrory v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In the Interest of L.R.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Deboer Construction, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. Reliance Insurance Company and the Insurance Center, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Wantulok v. WantulokWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
- Becker v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Bailey v. BantherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.