Legal Opinion
B.H. v. Gold Fields Mining Corp.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 7, 2005No. 04CV564 JOEPJCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CLEARY, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter came before the Court for hearing on September 26, 2005, on Plaintiffs’ Motions [Dkt. ## 265 & 269] to Compel Production of Documents Based on Testamentary (sic) Use of Work Product.1 At the hear*654ing, Plaintiffs for the first time presented the Court and Defendants with 14 exhibits to be used in their presentation to the Court. Defendants objected thereto. The Court allowed Plaintiffs’ counsel to use the documents as an aid in organizing and presenting his arguments, but because of their untimely submission, these exhibits will not be…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- In re Kidder Peabody Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Johnson v. GmeinderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carlson v. Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Xfinity Mobile v. Globalgurutech LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Xfinity Mobile v. Globalgurutech LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024