Legal Opinion
State v. Watts, 21982 (5-18-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 18, 2007No. 21982PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} This appeal is brought by the State pursuant to R.C. 2945.67 and Crim.R. 12(K), from the trial court's judgment granting Defendant's motion to suppress evidence.
{¶ 2} On September 20, 2006, at 5:43 p.m., Dayton Police
Officers Michael Fuller and Daniel Reynolds stopped a Buick Park Avenue with dark tinted windows near the intersection of Glenbrook and Carnegie in Dayton. The windows were so dark that Officer Fuller could not see inside the vehicle, and Officer Fuller knew from his experience that the condition constituted a window tint violation.
{¶ 3} Defendant, Ashanta Watts, was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RetherfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. FerranteOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. GeorgeOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. BalesOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. MabryOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. SextonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.