Legal Opinion
Kroeger v. Department of Environmental Protection
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 7, 2005PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, CALKINS, and LEVY, JJ.
Dissent: DANA, and ALEXANDER, JJ.
CALKINS, J.
[¶ 1] Harold A. Kroeger appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) affirming the De*568partment of Environmental Protection’s denial of his application to build a dock. The Department denied the permit because it found that the proposed dock did not meet the requirements of the Natural Resources Protection Act, 38 M.R.S.A. §§ 480-A to-Z (2001 & Supp.2004), in two respects: (1) the dock would unreasonably interfere with existing scenic uses, and (2)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- Hannum v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Murphy v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Lentine v. Town of St. GeorgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
3Cited by20 opinions
- Uliano v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Paul A. Dyer v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Bailey v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Hannum v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Quiland, Inc. v. Wells Sanitary DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.