Legal Opinion

Paul A. Dyer v. Superintendent of Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 25, 2013No. Docket BCD-12-469PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.

[¶ 1] Paul A. Dyer appeals from a judgment entered in the Business and Consumer Docket (Horton, J.) pursuant to 5 M.R.S. § 11007 (2012) and M.R. Civ. P. 80C that affirmed the decision of the Superintendent of Insurance revoking Dyer’s licenses and ordering him to pay civil penalties and restitution for violations of the Maine Insurance Code. See 24-A M.R.S. §§ 12-Ad), (5)-(6), 1417 (2012). Dyer makes three arguments on appeal: (1) the Superintendent erred in making factual findings and credibility determinations; (2) it was an abuse of the Superintendent’s discretion to reinstate the same…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gulick v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Pettinelli v. YostSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. Friends of Lincoln Lakes v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. Hall v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. Imagineering, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. Darling'sSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. F. Lee Bailey v. Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. In re Child of Kimberlee C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  4. In re Kimberlee C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  5. Adoption of T.D.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API