Legal Opinion
Bailey v. City of Lewiston
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 20, 2017No. Docket: WCB-16-204PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.
[¶ 1] The City of Lewiston and its insurer, Cannon Cochran Management Services (referred to collectively as the City), appeal from a decree of the Workers’ Compensation Board Appellate Division vacating the hearing officer’s (Goodnough, HO)1 grant of the City’s petition to determine the extent of Michael F. Bailey’s permanent impairment. See 39-A M.R.S. § 322 (2016). We affirm the Appellate Division’s decision.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] The following facts, which are derived from a 2014 Workers’ Compensation Board decree granting the City’s petition to determine the extent of Bailey’s permanent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Standish Telephone Co. v. Saco River Telegraph & Telephone Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Kroeger v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Guaranty Fund Management Services v. Workers' Compensation BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Hird v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Guiggey v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gaetan H. Bourgoin v. Twin Rivers Paper Company, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Victor S. Urrutia v. Interstate Brands InternationalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Roger Desgrosseilliers v. Auburn Sheet Metal at al.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- Larry Huff v. Regional Transportation ProgramSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Lorraine Somers v. S.D. Warren CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.