Legal Opinion

In Re Restraint of Bowman Gaskins Financial Group

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided November 24, 2004No. A03-147PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

In this ongoing visa fraud, money laundering, and tax evasion investigation of an individual and the company he controls, the government seeks by preindictment process to restrain funds the targeted company paid to the targeted individual’s daughters for the purpose of preserving these funds for future forfeiture. The government claims this money is subject to preindietment restraint, and ultimately to forfeiture, on the grounds (i) that these funds, if not proceeds of visa fraud and money laundering, are subject to preindietment restraint as substitute…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. In Re JOHN DOE CORPORATION. JOHN DOE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re 650 Fifth Ave. and Related PropertiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. United States v. WingerterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
  3. United States v. IvanchukovDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
  4. United States v. PatelDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2013
  5. United States v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API