Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller Ex Rel. Estate of Kelly v. Mylan Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 21, 2014No. 12-2502Published

1DissentMcKEAGUE, Circuit Judge

The Majority finds that there remains a factual determination as to whether the fentanyl patch is a “combination product” under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. I disagree with the Majority’s interpretation of the Michigan immunity statute and would instead hold that Mylan’s Fentanyl Transdermal System is a “drug” under 21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1) and therefore Mylan is immune from suit under Michigan law. I respectfully dissent.

Determining whether the Mylan Fenta-nyl Transdermal System should be considered a “drug,” a “device,” or “combination product” requires first looking at the definition of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Henry CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Friendly Farms v. Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API