Miller Ex Rel. Estate of Kelly v. Mylan Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentMcKEAGUE, Circuit Judge
The Majority finds that there remains a factual determination as to whether the fentanyl patch is a “combination product” under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. I disagree with the Majority’s interpretation of the Michigan immunity statute and would instead hold that Mylan’s Fentanyl Transdermal System is a “drug” under 21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1) and therefore Mylan is immune from suit under Michigan law. I respectfully dissent.
Determining whether the Mylan Fenta-nyl Transdermal System should be considered a “drug,” a “device,” or “combination product” requires first looking at the definition of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Henry CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Friendly Farms v. Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.