Legal Opinion

State v. Sveum

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 18, 2002No. 01-0230PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.

¶ 1. Michael Sveum was convicted of stalking, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.32(2m) (1995-96); 1 harassment, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 947.013(lr); violating a harassment injunction issued under Wis. Stat. § 813.125(4); and criminal damage to property, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.01(1). Each count included a repeater allegation. 2 Sveum appeals the denial of a postconviction motion in which he argued that two of his convictions violate the double jeopardy clause because violating a harassment injunction is a lesser-included offense of harassment. After reviewing the record, we requested…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. State v. KuntzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HaukCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  2. Wieting Funeral Home of Chilton, Inc. v. Meridian Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  3. DeWitt Ross & Stevens, S.C. v. Galaxy Gaming & Racing Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  4. Rosario v. Acuity & Oliver Adjustment Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  5. State v. MacHganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API