Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Widdoss v. Esmay

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1948No. File No. 8989PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

By resolutions reciting respectively that there is in the treasury of Butte County the amount of $43,600 in the sinking fund, and the amount of $30,800 in the sinking fund interest fund “in excess of the amount necessary to pay all obligations, claims, or contemplated expenditures against said fund, including all interest which may accrue on and the princpal of all outstanding bonds,” and the amount of $31,600 in the permanent school fund land fund, “and the purpose for which this fund was created has been fully subserved, there remains no further use for such balance for the purpose for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tulare Independent School District No. 36 v. Crandon School District No. 17South Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Aldrich v. CollinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Hughes v. Board of Com'rsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Black v. GrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Jordan v. Mellette CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re the Appeal of the Sales Tax Refund Applications of Black Hills Power & Light Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. FeiokSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. FeyereisenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kalmbach v. City of MobridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API