United States v. Kratzenberg
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
RAICHLE, Senior Judge:
Appellate Defense Counsel contend that the military judge’s preconceived bias in favor of believing the testimony of the principle government witness against the accused deprived the accused of a fair and impartial trial. We agree.
Earlier on the day of the accused’s trial, the military judge had accepted a guilty plea in a companion case. The accused in that case, Airman Weiler, had confessed to the crime and implicated Kratzenberg as an aider and abettor. When queried as to whether he was aware of any matters which may constitute grounds for challenge against…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. ProctorU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. HarveyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
- United States v. ClarkU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. BurrisU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. Private E2 ERICK C. BLACKArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020