Legal Opinion
Washington Legal Foundation v. Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 15, 2001No. 00-50139PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
The Supreme Court having held in this case that, for purposes of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, interest earned on client-funds deposited in demand accounts pursuant to the Texas Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts (IOLTA) program is the “private property” of the client, Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation, 524 U.S. 156, 160, 172, 118 S.Ct. 1925, 141 L.Ed.2d 174 (1998), and the Court having remanded this case for consideration, inter alia, of two other sub-parts of the Takings Clause (whether there has been a “taking” and, if so, what…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Washington Legal Foundation v. Legal Foundation Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Gordon v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Community Bank & Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Parker v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- Washington Legal Foundation v. Legal FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.