Parker v. Barnhart
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE; AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BENNETT, Chief Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.INTRODUCTION.
A. Factual Background.
1. Statutory ffamework.
2. ’’Ticket to Work Act,” amendments .
a. Authorization of a “user fee”.
b. Mandate for a GAO study.
3. Announcement of the 2001 “user fee”.
4. The GAO Report.
Procedural Background.
1. The Complaint.
2. The parties’motions .
a. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment and judgment on the pleadings . CO to CO
b.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. RichmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Ridge v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
- Culbertson v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002