Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Norton
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 25, 2003No. 01-8102PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellants Stephen Gordon (“Gordon”) and the Diamond G Ranch, Inc. (“Diamond G”) challenge the Fish and Wildlife Service’s (“FWS”) control of gray wolves introduced under the Northern Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery Plan (“Recovery Plan”) near the Diamond G in the Dunoir Valley of northwestern Wyoming. Seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, they filed this action in federal district court alleging violations of the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause and the regulations promulgated under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). The district court dismissed the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Forest Guardians v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians v. Nielson Ex Rel. Utah Department of Environmental QualityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Los Alamos Study Group v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- State of Wyoming v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- E. Spire Communications, Inc. v. BacaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.