Legal Opinion

Federoff Et Ux. v. Harrison Const. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1949No. Appeal, 43PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The defendant appealed to the Superior Court from judgment on a verdict for plaintiffs in their suit to recover for damage to their dwelling house in Canonsburg, Washington County, resulting from a distant blasting operation conducted by defendant in leveling and otherwise preparing a tract of land as the site for a manufacturing plant. The plaintiffs’ house was distant from the blasting 1,600 feet (at some points) and 3,000 feet (at others). No material was thrown on their property; the damage resulted from vibration or concussion. In their complaint, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Mulchanock v. Whitehall Cement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Federoff Et Ux. v. Harrison Const. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Berg v. Reaction Motors DivisionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Stepan Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Kopka v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Lobozzo v. Adam Eidemiller, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. McCown v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API