Legal Opinion

Baier v. Glen Alden Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1938No. Appeal, 418PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This appeal is by defendant from judgment on a verdict for plaintiffs in an action of trespass to recover damages to their real estate caused by the use of dynamite by defendant’s contractor in drilling a hole in the sidewalk in front of, and about seven feet from, their house. The facts, which need not be repeated in detail, are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court reported in 131 Pa. Superior Ct. 309, 200 A. 190. The defense was that defendant had employed an independent contractor and was therefore not responsible for the contractor’s acts.

We find it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mulchanock v. Whitehall Cement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Rafferty v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Baier Et Ux. v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Chartiers V. Gas Co. v. WatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Chartiers V. Gas Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lobozzo v. Adam Eidemiller, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Summit Hotel Co. v. National Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Hillbrook Apartments, Inc. v. Nyce Crete Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Opal v. Material Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  5. Keefer v. LombardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API