Legal Opinion

Eisel v. Board of Education

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 29, 1991No. 139, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The legal theory advanced by the plaintiff in this wrongful death and survival action is that school counselors have a duty to intervene to attempt to prevent a student’s threatened suicide. The specific question presented is whether the duty contended for may be breached by junior high school counselors who fail to inform a parent of suicidal statements attributed to the parent’s child by fellow students where, when the counselors sought to discuss the subject, the adolescent denied ever making the statements. The circuit court granted summary judgment for the defendants,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Ashburn v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Mr. & Mrs. Doe Parents No. 1 v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mikell v. SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT NO. 33Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  3. Lee v. CorregedoreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Davis v. DipinoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Hoeffner Ex Rel. Estate of Hoeffner v. CitadelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API