Fiorentino v. Rapoport
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge Emeritus:
This is a consolidated appeal and cross-appeal from the final judgment entered after the trial court denied post-trial relief to both the plaintiff and the defendants in a legal malpractice ease. Appellant Rocco J. Fior-entino instituted the suit underlying this appeal by filing a complaint against cross-appellants Frank Rapoport, Alan Gordon, and *210the law firm of Saul, Ewing, Remiek & Saul. Thomas Rutter, Esquire, sitting as Judge Pro Tem, granted a compulsory nonsuit in favor of defendants and final judgment was entered on December 13, 1996. For the reasons…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Vattimo v. Lower Bucks Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Knopick v. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Kirschner v. K & L Gates LLPSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Glenbrook Leasing Co. v. BeausangSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commc'ns Network Int'l, Ltd. v. MullineauxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.