Legal Opinion

Fiorentino v. Rapoport

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1997No. 00045PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge Emeritus:

This is a consolidated appeal and cross-appeal from the final judgment entered after the trial court denied post-trial relief to both the plaintiff and the defendants in a legal malpractice ease. Appellant Rocco J. Fior-entino instituted the suit underlying this appeal by filing a complaint against cross-appellants Frank Rapoport, Alan Gordon, and *210the law firm of Saul, Ewing, Remiek & Saul. Thomas Rutter, Esquire, sitting as Judge Pro Tem, granted a compulsory nonsuit in favor of defendants and final judgment was entered on December 13, 1996. For the reasons…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Vattimo v. Lower Bucks Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Knopick v. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Kirschner v. K & L Gates LLPSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Glenbrook Leasing Co. v. BeausangSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commc'ns Network Int'l, Ltd. v. MullineauxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API