Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Azzarella

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1989No. E004149PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, J.

Petitioner was brought to Riverside General Hospital for a 72-hour detention for treatment and evaluation pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 5150 1 and subsequently was certified for an additional 14 days of intensive treatment on the grounds that he was gravely disabled as a result of a mental disorder. (§ 5250.) Petitioner sought judicial review by way of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. (§ 5275.) The evidentiary hearing was set for the following day at which time the County of Riverside (County) filed a motion for order directing petitioner to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Heater v. Southwood Psychiatric CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Jacobs v. GROSSMONT HOSPITALCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. State v. LavoieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. People v. Mary H.California Court of Appeal · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API