Legal Opinion
People v. Mary H.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 2016No. F071282PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DETJEN, J.
Appellant Mary H. was taken into custody for psychiatric evaluation and treatment for up to 72 hours pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 5150. (See fn. 6, post.) Consequently, after her release, she was banned from owning, possessing, controlling, receiving, or purchasing any firearm for five years. (§ 8103, subd. (f)(1).) Mary petitioned the Superior Court of Kern County to lift the prohibition. Following a hearing, the court denied the request, finding the preponderance of the evidence established Mary would not be likely to use firearms in a safe and lawful…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BraumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Miller CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. SeoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Vaughn CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021