Legal Opinion

Byrom v. Pendley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1986No. C-5154PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

HILL, Chief Justice.

We grant the respondent’s motion for rehearing, withdraw the opinion and judgment of June 18, 1986, and substitute this opinion.

The question presented for review is whether C.W. Byrom, a cotenant who drilled a producing well while denying, in a pending lawsuit, the validity of cotenant Paul Pendley’s interest, is a bad-faith trespasser as a matter of law. In a bench trial, the district court answered this question negatively, and awarded Byrom recovery against Pendley for his necessary and reasonable costs of production. 1

The court of appeals…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bonniwell v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. McKelvy v. BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Burnham v. Hardy Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Cox v. DavisonTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Shell Oil Co., Inc. v. HowthTexas Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. BP America Production Co. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Prize Energy Resources, L.P. v. Cliff Hoskins, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  5. Dyer v. Cotton, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API