Legal Opinion

Bayer v. City of North College Hill

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1986No. C-850182PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The dispute in this case concerns the disposition of property that had been dedicated on a subdivision plat as a public street but was never used for that purpose. Although appellant presents the issue as a conflict between the right of the city to convey property that is not needed for municipal purposes and the rights of abutting landowners to seek vacation of a street, the dispositive issue on appeal is whether, under R.C. 723.09, the court of common pleas may grant a petition for vacation of a street upon a motion for summary judgment without considering whether the vacation “will conduce…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. City of GirardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  2. Board of Education v. Unknown Heirs of AughinbaughOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Greenberg v. L. I. Snodgrass Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Sparrow v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. In re Vacation of Part of Michigan StreetLucas Circuit Court · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nusekabel v. Cincinnati Public School Employees Credit Union, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Eggert v. PuleoOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Viola Park v. City of Pickerington, 2006 Ca 00017 (6-6-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Wilson v. S. EuclidOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Dulebohn v. WaynesfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API