Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Coleman v. International Harvester Co. of America

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1910No. 15,192PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original proceeding in quo warranto. Judgment restraining the defendant from doing certain acts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Graves, J.:

On October 2,1906, the attorney-general filed in this court an original civil proceeding against the defendant, the International Harvester Company of America, a corporation, for the purpose of forfeiting *611the “charter, franchises, rights and privileges and corporate existence of the defendant within the state of Kansas” on account of its violations of the antitrust laws of the state, being chapter 257 of the Laws of 1889, chapter 265 of the Laws of 1897, and chapter 293 of the Laws of 1899.

On October 13, 1906, he filed an information against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Conley v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. CochranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  5. State ex rel. Coleman v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gas Service Co. v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. State v. Glenn Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Garden City Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Toelle v. Sells-Floto Shows Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. McKinney v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API