Bojko v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Appeal from an order sustaining a general demurrer to the complaint.
The complaint alleges as a first cause of action that defendant city of Minneapolis is a municipal corporation duly created and existing under the laws of the state. That, among the different departments for the conduct of its municipal affairs, there is created by the city charter one designated as the department of public welfare, under which the duty is imposed upon the city to suppress and abate all nuisances created or existing within the limits of the municipality. It further alleges that the duty so imposed upon the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Snider v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Emmons v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Lane v. Minnesota State Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Miller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- McHugh v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bingham v. BD. OF ED. OF OGDEN CITYUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Niblock v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- St. John v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Howard v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Mokovich v. Independent School District No. 22Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.