Legal Opinion

Mokovich v. Independent School District No. 22

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1929No. 27,314PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 225 N.W. 292. Appeal by plaintiff from an order sustaining a demurrer to his complaint.

Defendant is an independent school district of this state. Plaintiff was a pupil in defendant's high school. He was injured at a football game conducted by the district as a part of its educational system. The charge is that defendant's officers and agents negligently used unslaked lime to mark the lines on the football field and thereby created a nuisance; that plaintiff was one of the players in defendant's school team; and that during the game he was thrown to the ground and his head and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Benton v. Trustees of the City HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Boise Development Co. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Emmons v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Ackeret v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Keever v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Highview North Apartments v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Morris v. Union High School District AWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Rittmiller v. School Dist. No. 84District Court, D. Minnesota · 1952
  4. Shaw v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Sawaya v. Tucson High School District No. 1Arizona Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API